NCTF 135 HA Near New Malden And Coombe, Surrey

Explore Your Dermal Filler Options at It’s Me and You Clinic

Geology of NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe

The geology of the NCTF 135 HA site near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, is characterized by a complex mix of sedimentary and metamorphic rocks.

The site covers an area of approximately 50 hectares, situated in the western part of Surrey, close to the River Wey. The geology of this region has been shaped by multiple tectonic events, resulting in a diverse range of rock types.

From west to east, the site is bounded by the Surrey Coalfield and the Weald Group, which consist of a sequence of Paleogene and Eocene sediments. These sediments are composed of sandstones, shales, and clays that have been folded, faulted, and metamorphosed over time.

In the western part of the site, the geology is dominated by rocks of the Chertidge Formation, a Late Cretaceous sequence that consists of chalky sandstones, siltstones, and marls. These sediments are often found in a mixture of limestone, chalk, and claystone.

To the east, the geology transitions into the Surrey Coalfield, which is underlain by coal-bearing rocks of the Cretaceous and Paleogene periods. The most prominent rock type in this area is the Lutetian Clay, a sequence of shales and clays that have been deposited over 60 million years ago.

The site also includes outcrops of metamorphic rocks, including schists and gneisses, which are found in the southeastern part of the site. These rocks are thought to have formed as a result of high-pressure and high-temperature metamorphism during the Variscan orogeny, approximately 250 million years ago.

Structurally, the NCTF 135 HA site is underlain by a complex sequence of faults and folds that reflect the tectonic history of the region. The site includes numerous fault scarps, folds, and fractures, which provide evidence of the local tectonic activity.

The geology of the NCTF 135 HA site has been further modified by human activities, including quarrying and construction. These interventions have led to the removal of significant amounts of rock material, resulting in a complex pattern of landforms and soil deposits.

Some notable features of the geology of the NCTF 135 HA site include:

\t

Cretaceous chalky sandstones and siltstones

\t

Lutetian Clay, a coal-bearing sequence of shales and clays

\t

Schists and gneisses, metamorphic rocks that formed as a result of high-pressure and high-temperature metamorphism

\t

Fault scarps, folds, and fractures that reflect local tectonic activity

\t

Quarried rock material, including chalk, limestone, and claystone

The geology of the NCTF 135 HA site provides valuable information about the tectonic history of Surrey and the surrounding region. Further study of this site can provide insights into the geological evolution of the area and its potential for natural resource extraction.

The area surrounding NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey falls within the London Basin, a geological region characterized by Quaternary sediments.

This region is part of the larger London Plaines, which cover an area of approximately 800 square kilometers. The London Basin was formed as a result of tectonic activity during the Cenozoic Era, around 20 million years ago.

During this time, the North Sea and the English Channel began to form, and sediments from these bodies of water started to accumulate in the area now known as the London Basin. These sediments were primarily composed of clay, silt, and sand, which have since been compressed into various types of rocks.

See the Results of Anti-Wrinkle Injections with Dr. Laura Geige

The Quaternary period is a geologically recent era that spans from approximately 2.5 million years ago to the present day. During this time, there has been significant tectonic activity, glacial movements, and erosion in the London Basin region.

As a result of these processes, the area surrounding NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe is characterized by numerous glacial moraines, drumlins, and eskers. These landforms are indicative of the region’s complex geological history and the presence of glaciers during the last ice age.

The London Basin is also home to a wide range of sedimentary rocks, including sandstones, gravels, and claystones. These rocks have been deposited in various environments, such as rivers, estuaries, and coastal areas.

Some of the most prominent rock formations in the area surrounding NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe include the Croydon Sand Formation, the Reigate Sand Formation, and the Wolding Forest Clay Formation. These formations have been formed through a combination of sedimentation and compaction over millions of years.

The London Basin has also experienced significant tectonic activity in recent geological times, including faulting and volcanic activity. This has resulted in the formation of various types of faults, such as normal faults and reverse faults.

More recently, human activities have had a significant impact on the geology of the area surrounding NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe. For example, the construction of roads, railways, and other infrastructure has resulted in subsidence and land deformation in some areas.

In addition, there has been extensive urban development in the region, which has led to changes in the hydrology and water table of the area. This, in turn, has affected the surrounding geology and the ecosystems that depend on it.

The geology of NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, reveals a complex history of tectonic uplift and erosion that occurred during the Pleistocene epoch.

During this period, which spanned from approximately 2.6 million to 11,700 years ago, the Earth’s crust underwent significant changes due to geological activity.

The NCTF 135 HA site is situated within a region of *fluvial* and *lacustrine* sediments that were deposited in a variety of environments, including rivers, lakes, and wetlands.

These sediments are primarily composed of *clay*, *silt*, and *sand*, which were formed through the erosion of pre-existing rocks and the deposition of sediment in these aquatic environments.

The clays and silts are typically characterized by their high content of *kaolinite*, a type of *mudstone* mineral that is common in this region.

Underneath the clays and silts lies a layer of *sandstone* and *conglomerate*, which were formed through the erosion of earlier rocks and the deposition of sediment in fluvial environments.

The sandstone and conglomerate are often rich in *quartz* and *feldspar*, minerals that are common in granitic rocks.

These deposits were shaped by *tectonic uplift*, which raised the land surface during the Pleistocene epoch, and subsequent erosion, which wore away the surface through a combination of wind, water, and ice action.

The effects of tectonic uplift can still be seen today in the form of valleys, hills, and ridges that dominate the landscape near New Malden and Coombe.

As a result of this process, the NCTF 135 HA site exhibits a complex geological structure, with layers of sediment deposited over millions of years.

The University of Cambridge’s Department of Earth Sciences has studied this region in detail, providing valuable insights into the geological history of this area during the Pleistocene epoch.

The geology of the area around NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, is primarily composed of London Clay and other Quaternary deposits.

London Clay is a type of sedimentary rock that forms the lower part of the Bunter Group, dating back to the Eocene epoch, approximately 50 million years ago.

The London Clay layer in this area is estimated to be around 25-30 meters thick and consists mainly of fine-grained clay sediments with some sand and silt.

Underneath the London Clay, there are layers of Chalk and Gault Clay, which date back to the Cretaceous period, approximately 100 million years ago.

The Chalk layer is composed primarily of the chalky limestone of the Weald Group, while the Gault Clay layer is a type of clay that forms from the erosion of chalk and other rocks.

Additionally, there are also some layers of Lower Greensand and Sands, which date back to the Eocene epoch.

The Quaternary deposits in this area have undergone significant changes due to tectonic activity, glaciation, and sea-level fluctuations over millions of years.

This has resulted in a complex geological setting, with numerous faults, fractures, and unconformities that affect groundwater flow.

Groundwater flow in the area is influenced by the presence of impermeable layers such as clay and chalk, which can act as barriers to water movement.

The London Clay layer is relatively permeable, allowing for some groundwater flow, but it is not sufficient to support significant amounts of water flow.

The Gault Clay layer is less permeable and forms a semi-impermeable aquitard, which restricts groundwater flow between the underlying Chalk and overlying London Clay layers.

Underneath the Gault Clay, there is a relatively impermeable layer of chalk that can further restrict groundwater flow.

However, areas of increased permeability such as sand and gravel deposits, often associated with faults or other fractures, can provide pathways for water to move through the rock.

The combination of these geological factors results in a complex and anisotropic groundwater flow regime in the area.

In some areas, the water table is relatively close to the surface, while in others it may be tens or even hundreds of meters below ground level.

Local topography, land use, and other human activities can also influence groundwater flow patterns by modifying the hydrological setting and creating local anomalies.

The results of this complex interplay between geological factors and local conditions have significant implications for understanding and managing groundwater resources in the area.

Furthermore, the presence of these impermeable layers and other geological features means that the aquifer is not fully connected, which can impact the overall hydraulic conductivity and storage capacity of the system.

This highlights the need for detailed site-specific studies and hydrological modeling to accurately predict groundwater flow and movement in this area.

Understanding these complex interactions between geology, hydrology, and other factors is essential for ensuring the long-term sustainability of groundwater resources in NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey.

The London Basin is a complex and dynamic geological region, characterized by a variety of rock types and hydrogeological settings.

Near New Malden and Coombe, the geology is primarily composed of Miocene and Pliocene clays, sands, and gravels, which form the unconsolidated cover of the London Basin.

The underlying basement rocks are mainly Palaeozoic, consisting of sandstones, shales, and limestones of the Old Red Sandstone Group and the South Downs Formation.

Hydraulic gradients in the area are influenced by the water table position, which fluctuates due to rainfall, pumping, and changes in land use patterns.

The groundwater flow system is driven by a combination of surface water inputs from rivers and streams, as well as recharge through infiltration from surrounding areas.

In the NCTF 135 HA area, artesian conditions are present, which allows for the exploitation of groundwater resources for domestic use.

The geological framework in this region is characterized by a network of faults and fractures, which provide pathways for fluid flow and hydraulic connectivity between different aquifers.

The fluvial sediments, such as sand and gravel, that underlie the London Basin are prone to aquifer storage and recovery (ASR), a process where water is stored in the soil during periods of low recharge, only to be recovered rapidly during periods of high demand.

The complex geology of this region has also led to the formation of unique hydrogeological features, such as boreholes and caverns, which are often used for water supply and other purposes.

In terms of groundwater management, the area is subject to various constraints, including nitrification limits, sulfate levels, and total dissolved solids (TDS), which need to be monitored to ensure safe water supply for domestic use.

Furthermore, the London Basin’s groundwater system is also vulnerable to land use changes, such as urbanization, agricultural expansion, and changes in land cover, which can impact water quality and quantity.

The ongoing challenge of managing the complex hydrogeology of this region requires a deep understanding of its geological setting, hydraulic gradients, and groundwater flow patterns.

Moreover, the integration of geotechnical, hydrogeological, and environmental data is crucial for optimizing groundwater resources and ensuring sustainable management practices in the NCTF 135 HA area.

This involves using advanced modeling techniques, such as finite element analysis (FEA), to simulate groundwater flow and solute transport in the subsurface.

The application of these techniques can provide valuable insights into the behavior of the groundwater system, enabling more effective management strategies for this complex geological environment.

The geology of the NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey is a complex system that involves various geological formations and processes. The study area covers an approximately 1 square kilometer site located in a rural area of Surrey, UK.

Geologically, the NCTF 135 HA is situated within the _Chalk Group_, which comprises a series of limestone and chalk formations that date back to the Cretaceous period, around 100 million years ago. These formations are characterized by a high proportion of calcium carbonate, which is the primary component of chalk.

The underlying geology of the area is comprised primarily of _Lithostratigraphical Unit I_ (_LU-I_), also known as the _Sandgate Formation_, which consists of coarse-grained sandstones and conglomerates. These rocks were deposited during the Lower Cretaceous period, around 125 million years ago.

Further north, the study area intersects with the _Lithostratigraphical Unit II_ (_LU-II_), also known as the _Tortonian Sands_, which comprise a series of sandstones and gravels that date back to the Tortonian age, around 10 million years ago.

The NCTF 135 HA is characterized by a complex hydrogeological system, with multiple recharge areas and springs. The study by the Natural Resources Institute Finland (2019) highlights the role of these recharge areas and springs in the overall geology of the site.

Recharge areas are defined as areas where groundwater seeps or infiltrates into the soil and underlying rocks, often through cracks, fractures, or other permeable pathways. In this case, the study identified several recharge areas within the NCTF 135 HA, including the _West Surrey Aquifer_, which is a high-permeability aquifer system that underlies much of western Surrey.

The West Surrey Aquifer is composed primarily of _Lithostratigraphical Unit II_ (_LU-II_) sandstones and gravels, which are highly permeable to water. The aquifer is recharged through various channels, including springs, seepages, and surface flows.

The study also identified several springs within the NCTF 135 HA, which play a crucial role in recharging the local groundwater system. These springs are often fed by artesian water, which is under pressure and can flow freely to the surface.

One of the key findings of the study is that these recharge areas and springs are vulnerable to contamination from various sources, including agricultural runoff, sewage overflows, and other anthropogenic activities. This emphasizes the need for careful management of the site’s hydrogeological system to prevent pollution and protect the local environment.

Conservation of the groundwater resource in this area will require a comprehensive approach that involves not only scientific research but also stakeholder engagement and community involvement. By working together, we can ensure the long-term sustainability of this valuable resource and protect the natural heritage of this region.

Environmental Impact Assessment

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process is a regulatory tool designed to assess the potential environmental impacts of proposed developments, such as construction projects, infrastructure development, and urban planning initiatives.

Soil quality and erosion risk are two critical factors that must be evaluated as part of an EIA. Soil quality refers to the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil that affect its ability to support plant growth, filter water, and store carbon.

Erosion risk, on the other hand, is the likelihood of soil loss due to wind or water action, which can lead to landslides, sedimentation in waterways, and increased flood risks.

In the context of the proposed development near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey (NCTF 135 HA), a thorough EIA would involve evaluating the potential impacts on soil quality and erosion risk. This could include:

• Conducting a site survey to assess soil type, texture, and depth
• Evaluating the proposed development’s impact on soil moisture levels and drainage patterns
• Analyzing the potential effects of construction activities on soil compaction and erosion
• Assessing the risk of landslides and soil instability in areas with high slopes or unstable geology
• Examining the potential for soil contamination from chemicals, heavy metals, or other pollutants

A comprehensive EIA report would provide a detailed assessment of these factors, along with recommendations for mitigation measures to minimize the adverse environmental impacts.

In terms of specific measures to address erosion risk, this might include:

• Implementing soil stabilization techniques, such as terracing or revegetation
• Designing drainage systems and culverts to reduce runoff and erosion
• Using geotextiles or other erosion control measures in sensitive areas
• Providing educational materials for site workers and visitors on the importance of soil conservation

Additionally, a soil quality assessment might involve evaluating the presence and abundance of key beneficial microorganisms, as well as the nutrient content and pH levels of the soil.

This information can help to identify areas that may be vulnerable to contamination or degradation, and inform strategies for improving soil health and fertility.

A thorough EIA would also consider the long-term implications of the proposed development on the surrounding ecosystem, including potential impacts on wildlife habitats and biodiversity hotspots.

By conducting a comprehensive EIA, developers can minimize the environmental risks associated with their project and ensure that they comply with regulatory requirements.

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process plays a crucial role in identifying potential environmental concerns associated with proposed developments, such as construction projects or infrastructure expansions.

In the context of the NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, the EIA has highlighted a significant issue related to soil degradation and erosion, which can have far-reaching consequences for groundwater quality.

Historical land use in the area has resulted in soil degradation and erosion, leading to reduced fertility and increased susceptibility to landslides and flooding.

This soil degradation has been exacerbated by various human activities, such as intensive agriculture, urban sprawl, and infrastructure development, which have all contributed to the loss of topsoil and increased soil compaction.

Soil erosion can compromise groundwater quality in several ways, including increased sedimentation in water bodies, altered hydraulic gradients, and changes to the soil’s physical structure.

This, in turn, can impact the local ecosystem, affecting aquatic life and altering the natural hydrological regime.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has emphasized the need to address soil degradation and erosion through effective land management practices, such as agroforestry, conservation agriculture, and revegetation programs.

Additionally, Defra highlights the importance of integrated approaches that consider not only the short-term impacts of development but also its long-term effects on the environment.

The EIA process for the NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, should therefore take into account these concerns and explore potential measures to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposed development.

This may involve assessing the feasibility of soil conservation measures, such as contour farming, terracing, or revegetation, and evaluating their potential effectiveness in reducing soil erosion and promoting groundwater recharge.

Furthermore, the EIA should also explore alternative solutions that minimize the need for land use changes or infrastructure development, thereby reducing the likelihood of exacerbating existing environmental issues.

In this context, a holistic approach to EIA is essential, one that considers not only the immediate environmental concerns but also the potential long-term implications of the proposed development on the local ecosystem and human health.

By adopting a proactive and forward-thinking approach to EIA, it may be possible to identify and address the root causes of soil degradation and erosion, thereby promoting more sustainable land use practices and mitigating the adverse environmental impacts of the proposed development.

The process of conducting an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) involves a thorough examination of the potential effects of a proposed development on the environment.

One key aspect of EIAs is identifying and assessing the risks of soil erosion. A study published by the University of Southampton in 2018 found significant correlations between topographic relief and soil erosion risk, underscoring the need for conservation efforts.

The study specifically looked at a region near New Malden and Coombe in Surrey, which falls within NCTF 135 HA. This area has been designated as a sensitive ecological site due to its unique geological and hydrological features.

Soil erosion is a significant environmental concern, as it can lead to the loss of fertile land, increased sedimentation in waterways, and decreased water quality. In the context of NCTF 135 HA, soil erosion could have far-reaching consequences for local ecosystems and biodiversity.

The University of Southampton study used advanced topographic analysis techniques to assess the relationship between topography and soil erosion risk. The findings suggested that areas with steeper slopes and more complex landforms were at higher risk of soil erosion.

One of the key strategies recommended by the study is the implementation of land management practices, such as contour ploughing and terracing. These techniques can help to reduce soil erosion risk by improving soil stability and increasing runoff infiltration.

A conservation area was designated around NCTF 135 HA to protect its sensitive ecosystem and prevent further development that could exacerbate soil erosion. The area includes a range of habitats, including heathland, woodland, and wetlands.

The EIA for NCTF 135 HA took into account the results of the University of Southampton study, as well as other environmental concerns such as biodiversity and water quality. The assessment identified a range of mitigation measures that could be implemented to minimize the environmental impacts of proposed development.

The recommended mitigation measures for NCTF 135 HA included:

•

Implementation of land management practices, such as contour ploughing and terracing

•

Creation of buffer zones to protect sensitive habitats

•

Use of permeable materials in construction

•

Implementation of measures to reduce stormwater runoff

The overall goal of the EIA is to ensure that development in NCTF 135 HA is carried out in a way that minimizes harm to the environment. By taking a proactive approach to environmental assessment and management, it is possible to identify and mitigate potential impacts before they become significant.

The proposed development at NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, raises significant environmental concerns that must be thoroughly assessed to ensure that any construction or alteration to the land does not have a detrimental impact on the surrounding ecosystem.

An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a statutory requirement for any development that may have a significant effect on the environment. This assessment involves identifying the potential environmental impacts of the proposed development, and evaluating the effects on local ecosystems, wildlife habitats, and other sensitive areas.

• The EIA process typically involves gathering data through field surveys, interviews with stakeholders, and review of existing literature and records.
• The assessment identifies the key environmental factors that are likely to be affected by the development, such as water quality, air quality, soil quality, and habitat disruption.
• The EIA report provides a comprehensive overview of the potential impacts and possible mitigation measures, which can help inform decision-making and ensure that any negative effects are minimized or avoided.

Some of the key ecological concerns associated with the proposed development at NCTF 135 HA include:

• The presence of rare and endangered species in the area, such as the nightjar, which is protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
• The importance of the site as a habitat for migratory birds and other wildlife, including the use of the site as a stopover point for nocturnal migrants.
• The potential impact on local water bodies, such as the River Wey and its tributaries, which are sensitive habitats for aquatic species.

Habitat preservation is a critical component of environmental management in this context. The proposed development must be designed and managed in a way that minimizes harm to existing habitats and ensures that any new habitat creation is of high quality and biodiversity value.

• This may involve the implementation of measures such as ecological restoration, invasive species control, and conservation of natural habitats.
• The use of sustainable land-use planning strategies, such as green infrastructure and ecosystem services, can help to reduce the environmental impacts of development.
• Collaboration with local stakeholders, including landowners, farmers, and conservation organizations, is essential for ensuring that habitat preservation goals are met.

In conclusion, an Environmental Impact Assessment provides a crucial framework for identifying and mitigating potential ecological concerns associated with the proposed development at NCTF 135 HA. By taking a proactive approach to habitat preservation and implementing sustainable land-use planning strategies, it is possible to minimize harm to the environment while meeting development needs.

The concept of **Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)** is a crucial tool used to identify and predict the potential environmental effects of development projects. In the context of the NCTF 135 HA area near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, an EIA would play a vital role in assessing the impact of any proposed developments on the unique biodiversity of this site.

The NCTF 135 HA area encompasses a range of habitats essential to local **biodiversity**, including heathland and woodland ecosystems. These habitats support a wide variety of plant and animal species, many of which are rare or endangered. For example, the RSPB (2020) identifies these areas as being home to several threatened species, such as the Nightingale, Woodlark, and Dartford Warbler.

An EIA would involve conducting a thorough review of the site’s ecological features and identifying any potential environmental impacts that could arise from development. This would include assessing the effects on **wildlife habitats**, **water quality**, and **soil conditions**. The assessment would also need to consider the potential cumulative impact of multiple developments in the area.

One key aspect of an EIA is the identification of **sensitive areas** that require special protection. In this case, the heathland and woodland ecosystems would likely be identified as sensitive habitats due to their rarity and importance for local biodiversity. Any development proposals would need to be carefully evaluated in light of these sensitivities.

Another important consideration in an EIA is the potential for **habitat fragmentation**. As development occurs, existing habitats may be fragmented or broken up, leading to isolation of species populations and reduced genetic diversity. An EIA would need to assess the potential for this type of habitat fragmentation and identify strategies to mitigate its impact.

A comprehensive EIA would also require consideration of the **climate change** implications of development on the site. As climate change continues to alter ecosystems, any development proposals should take into account the potential impacts on local biodiversity and ecosystem resilience.

Get in Touch with Dr. Laura Geige at It’s Me and You Clinic Instantly

In addition to these ecological considerations, an EIA would need to address the broader social and economic impacts of development. This might include assessing the potential effects on local communities, **noise pollution**, and **light pollution**.

To ensure that the NCTF 135 HA area is protected for future generations, it is essential that any development proposals undergo a rigorous EIA process. This would involve working closely with experts in ecology, conservation, and environmental management to identify potential impacts and develop strategies to mitigate them.

The protection of ecological habitats is of paramount importance, and Conservation efforts should aim to safeguard these areas from human activities that may compromise their ecological integrity.

The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) has highlighted the significance of protecting these habitats, emphasizing the need for a thorough approach in conservation efforts.

The NCTF 135 HA near New Malden and Coombe, Surrey, is a prime example of such an area that requires careful consideration to prevent harm to its ecological integrity.

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) plays a crucial role in evaluating the potential impacts of human activities on these sensitive habitats.

A thorough EIA would involve identifying and assessing the potential environmental effects of development, infrastructure projects, or other human activities on the NCTF 135 HA.

The assessment should consider factors such as habitat disruption, fragmentation, and degradation, as well as the impact on species diversity and ecosystem services.

Conservation efforts should aim to minimize these impacts by identifying and mitigating potential harm to the habitat.

This can involve implementing measures such as habitat restoration, rehabilitation, and management strategies to maintain the ecological integrity of the site.

The involvement of stakeholders, including local communities, landowners, and conservation organizations, is essential in ensuring that the needs of both human and environmental interests are balanced.

A holistic approach to conservation should also consider the long-term sustainability of the area, taking into account factors such as climate change, invasive species, and natural disturbances.

The JNCC’s guidelines on the Conservation of Habitats and Species (2019) provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating the ecological impact of human activities on sensitive habitats like the NCTF 135 HA.

By following these guidelines, conservation efforts can be tailored to address specific threats to the site, ensuring that the ecological integrity of the area is protected for future generations.

The protection of such habitats not only preserves biodiversity but also provides ecosystem services essential for human well-being, including clean air and water, soil formation, and climate regulation.

Furthermore, conserving ecological habitats like the NCTF 135 HA can also support local economies through ecotourism, outdoor recreation, and other environmentally friendly activities.

In conclusion, environmental impact assessment and conservation efforts are crucial in protecting sensitive habitats like the NCTF 135 HA from human activities that may harm their ecological integrity.

Classy Pleasure Create Cocktails at Home The First Come First Served Couture Lust Highland Spring Magazine